-
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6321 votes total - VotH Moderator
- (28172)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6321 votes total - VotH Moderator
- (28172)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6321 votes total - VotH Moderator
- (28172)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
coshawk said...
RPI does not consider margin of victory or defeat, which is why the committee favors it. They don't want teams running up the score just to boost their numbers.
Iowa had plenty of chances to control their own destiny. If they had beat MSU both times, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Purdue on the road they would have finish 14-4 in B10 and made it at least to the semis of the tournament. That by the way would have been a B10 title. If you count the 2 OT losses as being one point short we were 12 pts short of the B10 title. Any two of those would have put us in the tournament.
-
Skyhawk52 said...
As of the end of business, yesterday, the Jeff Sagarin Computer rankings show that the IOWA HAWKEYES are the #28 best team in the country.
This douche Lunardi has Middle Tennessee in the tournament??? Their strength of schedule is ranked at #212 in all the nation. Iowa's SOS is #62 in the nation. So, why would Midd Tenn even be considered over Iowa?
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/bkt1213.htm
28 Iowa 44 Illinois 46 Butler 53 Mid Teen 57 La Salle
If the NC2A committee has any common sense, the Iowa Hawkeyes will be IN the tourney.
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5908 votes total - (25307)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Todd Worly said...
I honestly don't understand your disdain for Lunardi. He knows what the specific criteria are for the selection committee, and bases his projections on that. He's extremely accurate at his projections. If you disagree with the selection criteria, that has nothing to do with Lunardi. All he does is pass along what he projects the committee will do, and he's correct much more often than not.
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6321 votes total - VotH Moderator
- (28172)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Todd Worly said...
I honestly don't understand your disdain for Lunardi. He knows what the specific criteria are for the selection committee, and bases his projections on that. He's extremely accurate at his projections. If you disagree with the selection criteria, that has nothing to do with Lunardi. All he does is pass along what he projects the committee will do, and he's correct much more often than not.
-
Todd Worly said...
I honestly don't understand your disdain for Lunardi. He knows what the specific criteria are for the selection committee, and bases his projections on that. He's extremely accurate at his projections. If you disagree with the selection criteria, that has nothing to do with Lunardi. All he does is pass along what he projects the committee will do, and he's correct much more often than not.
This post was edited by OhioHawk07 on 3/18/2013 at 2:23 PM
-
thejumper5 said...
I disagree with the assertion that Lunardi is extremely accurate. According to The Bracket Project, Lunardi was the 36th most accurate "bracketologist" from 2007-2012 among those who projected at least 3 tournaments.
http://bracketproject.50webs.com/rankings.html
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5908 votes total - (25307)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skyhawk52 said...
Alright, you Lunardi worshippers, please try to explain the FACT that Sagarin rankings, that have been around both Football & Basektball longer than this dopey RPI thing, has the Iowa Hawkeyes ranked as the #29 team in the country.
a) they played in the best league in America b) they finished with a better record in the league, than Minnysoda & Illinois (& neither team won head-to-head) 4) Iowa finished the season stronger than either Illinois or Minnysoda.
Just answer the questions. I trust very, very precious little coming from espn, these days.
-
Skyhawk52 said...
Alright, you Lunardi worshippers, please try to explain the FACT that Sagarin rankings, that have been around both Football & Basektball longer than this dopey RPI thing, has the Iowa Hawkeyes ranked as the #29 team in the country.
a) they played in the best league in America b) they finished with a better record in the league, than Minnysoda & Illinois (& neither team won head-to-head) 4) Iowa finished the season stronger than either Illinois or Minnysoda.
Just answer the questions. I trust very, very precious little coming from espn, these days.
-
Skyhawk52 said...
Alright, you Lunardi worshippers, please try to explain the FACT that Sagarin rankings, that have been around both Football & Basektball longer than this dopey RPI thing, has the Iowa Hawkeyes ranked as the #29 team in the country.
a) they played in the best league in America b) they finished with a better record in the league, than Minnysoda & Illinois (& neither team won head-to-head) 4) Iowa finished the season stronger than either Illinois or Minnysoda.
Just answer the questions. I trust very, very precious little coming from espn, these days.
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5908 votes total - (25307)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Buck Russell
- 5 stars Rating: 98
2124 votes total - CB Hawks
- (7683)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Buck Russell
- 5 stars Rating: 98
2124 votes total - CB Hawks
- (7683)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars












Sagarin ranks IOWA #28; Lunardi is a Tool