-
hawkeyebrad55 said...
Well he has had a lot of success at the BAD level. A national coy several big ten coy 3 top 8 s in a row, a BCS win and another BCS game. He can coach, but I think he needs to hire a good oc and dc and not have anything to do with them let them do their jobs and he just needs to coach, his style is outdated and he needs people to make it current
-
FG80 said...
A lot? 14 years at Iowa, five seasons of more than 8 wins. When you schedule 3 gimmes and ISU, you only need to go .500 in the B1G to reach 8 wins if you beat ISU. In conference (the real barometer, three seasons of more than 5 wins. THREE. If they lose to Nebraska, his 14 year average is 7.1 wins and 5.3 losses. KOK saved the 2010 season for him by pushing him hard to start Stanzi.
HawkiBrad55
- 5 stars Rating: 99
8322 votes total - "Once you go white you always stay tight": PerkAslut
- (20220)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
u2Hawk said...
When losing 42-10 with no chance to win, why do you think Ferentz chooses to keep playing Vandenberg?To me it makes sense to get some other guys on the bench to play mop-up duty and get some experience when it's a blow-out.
This is no disrespect to Vandenberg because he did play better today than in previous weeks.
fuisu ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4847 votes total - Buck Russell drinks the freshest protein shakes.... a bit nutty he claims
- (4333)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ToddBrommelkamp said...
Why is it that everyone automatically assumes Rudock will be the No. 1 QB next season?
Two of the three QBs who will be in Iowa City next fall are redshirting this year.
Could it be that Rudock is actually No. 3 on the depth chart and the gap between Nos. 1 & 3 is significant?

-
KFSuperStar ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
867 votes total - (944)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ToddBrommelkamp said...
Why is it that everyone automatically assumes Rudock will be the No. 1 QB next season?
Two of the three QBs who will be in Iowa City next fall are redshirting this year.
Could it be that Rudock is actually No. 3 on the depth chart and the gap between Nos. 1 & 3 is significant?
-
DieHardHawk said...
Rudock may not be the starter next season. I don't think most posters are assuming that, but, he was the potential next man in yesterday, and so that's primarily why his name is being mentioned in the context of giving backups some experience in blow-outs. Rudock came in with some fanfare, so understandably fans focus on him. Personally, I find it interesting that the major programs in his back yard didn't pursue him hard, so you have to wonder if he really is as talented as advertised.
As for next season, I imagine the QB competition will be the most intriguing storyline during the spring and summer, assuming we don't have some major coaching changes again (which I doubt). From what I have heard, it's wide open at this point.
Wrestling owns the Olympics
-
KFSuperStar said...
My theory that Ive stated as to why no Rudock in mop up duty is because KF is worried Jake would show something and possibly start a controversy with the team, fans and media. Couple posters seem to think that this is crazy. My question to those posters is what is the reasoning then?
1) Rudock is injured. 2) Rudock has informed the staff he plans to transfer after the season. 3) Doesnt want to rattle Rudock my playing him too soon. 4) Rudock is actually 4th so any snaps would be useless as he will never play and pry be our short punter in the future. 5) JVB needs all the snaps he can get even risking injury in a blowout. 6) Rudock sucks. Even tho he was good enough to move Derby to D and allow 2 other qbs to redshirt
Ok maybe Im beating a dead horse here but what else Iowa Football is there to take from this game. Some of these are a reach but the answer I keep coming back to is KF is worried that Rudock throws a couple of nice balls and maybe a garbage TD. Then KF has to answer the question is post game if JVB is gonna start next week. KF comes from the Belichick camp of hating the media. He fails to realize that the media provides millions of dollars of free publicity for his product. Les Miles gets it.
Wrestling owns the Olympics
-
Ok maybe Im beating a dead horse here but what else Iowa Football is there to take from this game. Some of these are a reach but the answer I keep coming back to is KF is worried that Rudock throws a couple of nice balls and maybe a garbage TD. Then KF has to answer the question is post game if JVB is gonna start next week. KF comes from the Belichick camp of hating the media. He fails to realize that the media provides millions of dollars of free publicity for his product. Les Miles gets it.
This post was edited by u2Hawk on 11/18/2012 at 10:27 AM
-
KFSuperStar said...
My theory that Ive stated as to why no Rudock in mop up duty is because KF is worried Jake would show something and possibly start a controversy with the team, fans and media. Couple posters seem to think that this is crazy. My question to those posters is what is the reasoning then?
1) Rudock is injured. 2) Rudock has informed the staff he plans to transfer after the season. 3) Doesnt want to rattle Rudock my playing him too soon. 4) Rudock is actually 4th so any snaps would be useless as he will never play and pry be our short punter in the future. 5) JVB needs all the snaps he can get even risking injury in a blowout. 6) Rudock sucks. Even tho he was good enough to move Derby to D and allow 2 other qbs to redshirt
Ok maybe Im beating a dead horse here but what else Iowa Football is there to take from this game. Some of these are a reach but the answer I keep coming back to is KF is worried that Rudock throws a couple of nice balls and maybe a garbage TD. Then KF has to answer the question is post game if JVB is gonna start next week. KF comes from the Belichick camp of hating the media. He fails to realize that the media provides millions of dollars of free publicity for his product. Les Miles gets it.
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5500 votes total - (24296)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Todd Worly said...
I realize a lot of people disagree with this, but I think Vandenberg has played much better than a lot of people have given him credit for. I'm not at all saying he's the next Dan Marino, but he's nowhere near this team's biggest problem, and I do think it's perfectly reasonable that he's a much better option than any other quarterback on the roster this season. Also, I can understand how Ferentz may be reluctant in certain situations to play a backup, because that may indicate he's given up on that game. If Iowa had the entire second team offense in the game, but Vandenberg was still in there, then I could better understand the gripe. But as long as the starters are in there, I don't have a problem with keeping Vandenberg in.
-
Papiohawk said...
This comment does not really follow the initial question, but is a thought about a statement made in one of the responses. I tire of hearing how many players Ferentz sends to the NFL. I would much rather read about the Hawks placing many on the All Big 10 teams. This means that players are being developed to be excellent college players instead if a couple All BIGs who go to the pros.
This post was edited by HawkiBrad55 on 11/20/2012 at 2:52 PM
HawkiBrad55
- 5 stars Rating: 99
8322 votes total - "Once you go white you always stay tight": PerkAslut
- (20220)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HawkiBrad55
- 5 stars Rating: 99
8322 votes total - "Once you go white you always stay tight": PerkAslut
- (20220)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars









Question