-
ChicagoHawk ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
180 votes total - (537)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ChicagoHawk said...
Slow day in sports I guess. Nepotism goes on at every college. Look at the Oklahoma Sooners (Stoops). Brother hires brother. Didn't Steve Alford hire his dad on as a coach? How about in wrestling. The Brands brothers coaching together. Nepotism goes on at every level. I go to DePaul university and the AD and the girls softball coach are related (cousins I believe). Just seems like there isn't much to report on right now in CFB.
You are right U2, if rules were broken then I see a problem, but I think this is a non issue here
-
ChicagoHawk ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
180 votes total - (537)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5447 votes total - (24158)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PerkAslut
- 5 stars Rating: 99
2606 votes total - I'm your density.
- (19501)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Buck Russell
- 5 stars Rating: 98
2086 votes total - CB Hawks
- (7581)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jpgillman said...
The article on espn has more info. He had worked for the athletic dept. for several years during grad school before being hired by KF. Also they were not engaged when he was hired - as Todd mentioned. It appears he is qualified, but KF should have reported that they got engaged to ensure this minor story didn't became what it is.
-
ThaiHawk said...
yeah, but is engagement an official thing? Heck, even marriage is not a sure thing. =( Like KF said, a nonissue. Can report it after the wedding.
Yup, slow day in sports. Hey, how about the women's team. Let's go make some noise. Beat the stinking Huskers. It's just looks funny with Neb having a wbb program and OSU is seeded 9th?
-
Todd Worly said...
One glaring fact that article didn't really discuss beyond a brief mention is that Barnes didn't get engaged to Ferentz's daughter until six months after he was hired. I have no inside info on this, and don't know anything about Barnes other than what he tweets from time to time. But who knows how serious their relationship was when Barnes was actually hired? It's possible that an eventual engagement was inevitable, but it's also possible that the relationship wasn't anywhere near serious yet.
-
silverhawk said...
well, actully you can't report it after the wedding and still comply. as i said back a ways, you can't report a relationship that doesn't exist--so if none existed when barnes was hired, no report was required--at that point. the engagement sure constituted a special relationship and needed to be reported. now, you can agree with kf that this is all stupid and should be left alone. the athletic dept cant pick/choose the rules it will follow based on the coach's sense of what is worth paying attention to. that is, of course, the point. heck, the hire would have held up even after reporting the engagement. coach was just too stubborn to see the easy way thru this. and that's the second point. stubbornness and willful blindness don't solve problems--or gain enuf first downs.
-
u2Hawk said...
Six months after he was hired, they were engaged.
That's moving very fast in their relationship to an engagement if they weren't dating or engaged before.
One would infer Kirk did nothing wrong. He's always been good at following the rules.
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5447 votes total - (24158)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
FG80 said...
I am going to guess if they got engaged six months after he was hired, he was probably dating her when he was hired. But it appears UI expected that he should have reported the relationship, at least when they got engaged. But who knows.
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5447 votes total - (24158)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
FG80 said...
The ESPN story said they were dating when he was hired. AFTER they were engaged, Ferentz asked for a waiver to extend Barnes' temporary employment for an additional year, through Jan. 16, 2014. A department memo said Ferentz and Barta had decided not to conduct a search for the job for the time being. AFTER they were engaged, Barnes started receiving health and dental insurance, and his pay went up 19 percent for his second year to $38,000. Curtis told the newspaper that she did not know Barnes' relationship to Ferentz when she sought the waiver. Ferentz said that he saw no reason to inform Barta or other officials about Barnes' engagement to his daughter.
I think the story is Ferentz didn't think it was necessary or important to let anyone know he was asking for a waiver not to properly search for a candidate so he could retain his daughter's future husband and also gave him a raise and benefits. Probably wouldn't have been much of an issue if he had just been upfront about it and handled it the same way as when BF was hired.
Recruiting Analyst for Voice of the Hawkeyes. Email: tworly@yahoo.com; Twitter: @ToddWorly247
Todd Worly
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5447 votes total - (24158)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars










Iowa reviewing Ferentz hiring future son-in-law to his staff