Online Now 321

Spring Fling: 5 to watch on offense

With Iowa’s spring practices drawing to a close with a public open practice and scrimmage slated for Saturday inside Kinnick Stadium, now seems like a good time to focus on some players that are looking to leave a good impression with the coaching staff prior to the end of the school year.

Damon Bullock

Damon Bullock has rocketed up the Iowa depth chart - just not the way he or most Hawkeye fans would have liked.

Here are five players on the offensive side of the ball worth watching as the final week of spring practices get under way in Iowa City. You won’t see guys like James Vandenberg on this list because most everyone knows what the starting quarterback brings to the fold. These are players who perhaps haven’t had their big break yet as a Hawkeye or may be getting it now and are looking to make the most of it.

Running back Damon Bullock

Raise your hand if you saw this one coming? Bullock sits atop the depth chart at running back in his first spring practices with the Hawkeyes following a myriad of injuries and defections that seemingly have plagued the Iowa program throughout Kirk Ferentz’s tenure.

Bullock wasn’t in Iowa City at this time last spring and when fall camp closed he was listed as a wide receiver. Only after an injury to Mika’il McCall and with Marcus Coker still on the mend did the freshman move back to running back. With the news that Jordan Canzeri injured his ACL and will likely be out for the majority – if not all – of 2012, Bullock becomes a man of interest for Hawk fans everywhere this spring.

Buloock rushed for more than 1,600 yards during his senior season of high school but has just 10 attempts for 20 yards in 2011 while stuck behind the likes of Coker (transfer), Canzeri (inury) and McCall (transfer) on the depth chart.

“Damon is really demonstrating to be a versatile athlete,” Iowa running backs coach Lester Erb said recently. “He has great vision, real good balance, can really catch the ball out of the backfield well, and he's a little bit faster than people give him credit for. He's kind of more of a slasher. He's not going to be a true downhill, punishing runner, but he does have some toughness and he has demonstrated he can lower his pads.”

Quarterback Jake Rudock

John Wienke’s move on the depth chart from co-backup quarterback last year to punter this spring signals the emergence of Rudock as the team’s No. 1 option behind Vandenberg.

“He'll be in the thick of things,” Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz said. “I think it's going to be tough for anybody to beat James out. If they can do it, great.”

We haven’t seen Rudock in game action at all since he redshirted all of 2011 but it’s well known the Iowa staff is high on the Florida product. Rudock won a slew of awards while prepping at St. Thomas Aquinas High, including South Florida Player of the Year. He fits the Iowa mold perfectly – a pro-style quarterback with a strong arm and good decision-making skills.

Right tackle Brett Van Sloten

The likely starter at right tackle for the Hawkeyes this fall, the 6-7, 292 pound junior entered the starting lineup at the Insight Bowl last December when Markus Zusevics fell ill the week of the game. It looks like Van Sloten will have first crack at holding down the job this spring and fall as the Hawks look to replace Zusevics, Riley Reiff and Adam Gettis on an offense that ranked dead last in the Big Ten in rushing a year ago.

Left tackle Brandon Scherff

Another intriguing newcomer, at least to the first-string, is Scherff. He’s listed as a co-starter at the position along with Andrew Donnal. Scherff has the upper hand here due to three starts last season and should break camp as the No. 1 option on the depth chart followed by Donnal.

Wide receiver Jacob Hillyer

The Hawks are going to need multiple targets for Vandenberg this fall without Marvin McNutt in the fold. It’s hard to believe this will be the second straight year the program is tasked with replacing the school’s all-time leading receiver but that’s the case as Iowa moves forward post-McNutt.

Keenan Davis and Kevonte Martin-Manley are the top two targets and receivers coach Erik Campbell said he likes how Martin-Manley is emerging as a threat this spring. But you need to go more than two-deep at receiver in the Big Ten and that’s where the question marks arise. Hillyer and Don Shumpert are the likely candidates to emerge as the No. 3 receiver along with senior Steven Staggs. Hillyer offers the most intrigue though. The redshirt freshman was a first-team all-state player as a prep in Texas.

“He's still learning as a receiver,” Cambell said. “He’s a freshman. It's his first spring. He doesn't know what it's all about, the competition level, competing every day. He's not on the scout team anymore. He's on the team where he's being looked at in those situations.”

    • Great write up here Todd. This just further illustrates how many spots are up for grabs right now. In theory, competition should bring out the best in everyone, and whoever wins each job should be ready to produce. It'll be interesting to see how it all plays out.

      Todd Worly

    • It's going to be interesting on who locks up that 3rd WR spot. Hillyer looks the part and I'm sure has more god given athleticism but I've had a buddy down in Iowa City for years telling me to watch Staggs.

      Staggs isn't sexy talent wise but the kids got probably the best hands on the team next year and runs great routes. My buddy use to say, "you gotta see this sophomore walkon he makes some amazing catches". Shumpert would surprise me. He's physical but I've notice he's sometimes inconsistent.

      Also Rudock vs Sokol is going to be a great match up. Don't even know who'm I'm rooting for there.

      fuisu

    • There are a ton of young guys I am very excited about, I think this team is going to be fun to watch for several years to come.

      HawkiBrad55

    • fuisu said...

      It's going to be interesting on who locks up that 3rd WR spot. Hillyer looks the part and I'm sure has more god given athleticism but I've had a buddy down in Iowa City for years telling me to watch Staggs.

      Staggs isn't sexy talent wise but the kids got probably the best hands on the team next year and runs great routes. My buddy use to say, "you gotta see this sophomore walkon he makes some amazing catches". Shumpert would surprise me. He's physical but I've notice he's sometimes inconsistent.

      Also Rudock vs Sokol is going to be a great match up. Don't even know who'm I'm rooting for there.

      As for Sokol vs. Rudock, I think Sokol will probably be redshirted unless he either earns the starting job, he's leaps and bounds better than Rudock, or one of Vandenberg or Rudock suffers a serious injury.

      Todd Worly

    • Just a random question. How much does Kirk listen to the position coaches regarding who should be getting playing time? How about Greg Davis? I know these may be hard questions to answer, just wondering. If all 3 say someone different should be playing, what happens? I'm guessing it's pretty clear to all for the most part. But I'm sure there has been times in the past where fans are wondering why isn't so and so playing? Just maybe wondering if bringing in a new OC will change that all? Or is it more of a position coach and Kirk decision?

      Morrison71

    • Oh and thanks Brommy! preciatechathumbsupcheers

      Morrison71

    • Morrison71 said...

      Just a random question. How much does Kirk listen to the position coaches regarding who should be getting playing time?

      I've got some former hawkeye football player friends (1 during the Fry era) and they've always had the belief on the offensive side of the ball KF has had the finial say on depth. It was also their belief that Norm was free to do whatever he liked for the most part of his career but I'd really like to know who's bright idea it was to start Sleeper over Bernstine....

      Oline is without a question KF's hands on and DJK not starting but yet going in on the second play of the game has KF written all over it. One player I know said KOK didn't want to play Jake C, and it was pretty evident who choose to sit Stanzi during the Pitt game in '07or'08. Imagine though that KF is ready for some change and willing to bet that Brian helps ease him in into the things Greg wants to try.

      fuisu

    • Morrison71 said...

      Just a random question. How much does Kirk listen to the position coaches regarding who should be getting playing time? How about Greg Davis? I know these may be hard questions to answer, just wondering. If all 3 say someone different should be playing, what happens? I'm guessing it's pretty clear to all for the most part. But I'm sure there has been times in the past where fans are wondering why isn't so and so playing? Just maybe wondering if bringing in a new OC will change that all? Or is it more of a position coach and Kirk decision?

      That's a great question, and I'm not sure anyone has an exact answer to it. Within every coaching staff at every level, debates about who should be playing take place all the time. A lot of it would probably depend on how much the head coach trusts that position coach/coordinator. In some cases, the head coach's decision will break the tie, but in other cases, the head coach will ultimately leave it up to the position coach or coordinator.

      Todd Worly

    • Morrison71 said...

      Just a random question. How much does Kirk listen to the position coaches regarding who should be getting playing time? How about Greg Davis? I know these may be hard questions to answer, just wondering. If all 3 say someone different should be playing, what happens? I'm guessing it's pretty clear to all for the most part. But I'm sure there has been times in the past where fans are wondering why isn't so and so playing? Just maybe wondering if bringing in a new OC will change that all? Or is it more of a position coach and Kirk decision?

      I would think it's mostly up to the coordinator in these decisions. The coordinator is going to know who and what type of player he wants on the field and possibly more importantly, who's on the field in what situations. Position coaches, especially on Iowa's staff are likely pretty trusted considering most have been here and around the game for a very long time but I think most of the time it's going to be coordinators making final decisions with the head coach breaking the occasional tie-breaker in certain situations, in come DJK.

      This post was edited by derHawkeye on 4/9/2012 at 10:17 PM

      derHawkeye

    • Morrison71 said...

      Just a random question. How much does Kirk listen to the position coaches regarding who should be getting playing time? How about Greg Davis? I know these may be hard questions to answer, just wondering. If all 3 say someone different should be playing, what happens? I'm guessing it's pretty clear to all for the most part. But I'm sure there has been times in the past where fans are wondering why isn't so and so playing? Just maybe wondering if bringing in a new OC will change that all? Or is it more of a position coach and Kirk decision?

      I think it depends. If I recall correctly in 2008 when Jake Christensen was starting and Stanzi was riding pine, O'Keefe wanted to make a change and Kirk took his time before the Pitt debacle.

      From what I'm told and from what I've observed at the few practices we've seen (Kids Day, spring game, etc) Kirk is a very active coach, moving from group to group. He keeps a pretty close watch on all the players so he may seek counsel from his assistants on some matters but it's not like he's never seeing the receivers and relying on Erik Campbell for advice.

      As far as Davis, he's brand new. Time will tell.

      ToddBrommelkamp

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial